A Christian Response to Ayn Rand

I recently finished Atlas Shrugged. I didn’t even mean to bring it home, I went to the library looking for an atlas, and the book looked the right size. I kid, I kid.

But it is a long book. Seriously.

It’s a book with a purpose though… Ayn Rand is putting together a defense or maybe an explanation.of her philosophy in fictional form.

Let me get the easy part out of the way. I think she’s wrong. Not all wrong, but wrong in some pretty important ways.

But, where she’s right, she has some important things to say to the world we live in today. Where’s she right?

Well… first, there are things that are true absolutely. It was funny to read her “Bad guys” who insisted that there were no absolutes. They come off as totally ridiculous (Because they are)… and yet, I know that there are people in our world who hold the same views and are taken quite seriously.

Second, for a man to know anything, he must use reason. He must think for himself. The apathy that leads people to simply adopt the views of others as their own is as problematic in the real world as it is in her book.

Third, she’s right that a man’s actions ought to be governed by what makes him happy.

For essentially the last 200 pages of Atlas Shrugged, I thought…. hmm, so close, but so far away. As the characters in the book remind each other, if something doesn’t seem to add up, you have to check your premises. I wanted to shout, “Check your premises” when a main character railed against spirituality because God was inherently unknowable and therefore irrational and dangerous.

While I concur that God is unknowable (and dangerous), there’s a fatal flaw in their assumption. They presume that because God is unknowable (that is, we cannot know Him perfectly because He is eternal and we are finite), we cannot know what He’d have of us.

This, then, is the Christian response: We agree that man needs a rational, absolute basis to his morality. We also agree that man should be governed by that which makes him happiest.

However, God has revealed Himself to man. In revealing Himself to man, God also gave man the information needed to understand what God would have of him. And, the Christian affirms that man ought to be governed by happiness… but not a short-term, earth-oriented happiness. The first answer in the Westminster Shorter Catechism reads “Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him for ever.”

If Ayn Rand or her characters were standing here today, I’d tell them how right they were and how wrong they were. I’d hope that they’d see the light. And even if they didn’t immediately, I’d probably be encouraged by them, because their worldview, at the very least, hinges on rationality. That means that at least we’re starting from the same place and we might get there eventually.

  1. Aunt Deb says:

    So you finished! Thanks for your observations, spot on and I was looking forward to them.

    Hey, what is the name of the place in WV where they are very particular about the speed you do when you pass through? :o )

    Love
    Aunty D

  2. 12stepgolf says:

    When I began reading Ayn I finely felt like someone understood what was going on in my mind. My first book was Epistemology, then I bought more and it was great even though she claimed to be an atheist. I understand her aversion to religion-she was brought up in Czarist Russia and you do know and understand what Rasputin and the Czarina’s relationship was and what caused the Russian Revolution? I believe man is infallible and what they have done to the teachings of Christ rather disappointing. I believe Christ taught us more than just a religion.
    Ayn doesn’t believe in altruism, and too many times religion promotes it, causing more problems than need be. Remember even Christ said “the poor will always be with us”, but we all as individuals can do somethings to help, we don’t just ignore them. You will have to read more of the Objectivist philosophy to appreciate what she has contributed. I am a Christian and do not have conflict with also being an Objectivist-I do not believe one has to sacrifice that to see the world objectively.

  3. Don Smith says:

    Hey Deb,
    You’d be thinkin’ of Summersville!

  4. andrew mackay says:

    12StepGolf… I hear what you’re saying. So much of what Ayn wrote made perfect sense and gave voice to many of the things I find myself trying to think through / say as I watch the world become, essentially, a version of what she described in Atlas . I think she’s right in a lot of ways… I just think the end she dreamed up for man is the wrong one — and it had to be, coming from an atheistic point of view. I’m with you though, doesn’t mean she wasn’t right about a whole lot of things.

    I’ll add some Objectivist philosophy to my reading list… any recommendations?

  5. 12stepgolf says:

    I would go to the book store or the library and just go to the philosophy section and you will find her right there-and I would start with these:
    # For the New Intellectual (1961)
    # The Virtue of Selfishness (1964)
    # Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal (1966)
    # The Romantic Manifesto (1969)
    # The New Left: The Anti-Industrial Revolution (1971)
    # Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology (1979)
    There is also an Ayn Rand Lexicon which helps understand her even more.
    There are also some interviews of her on u-tube with Phil Donohue and Mike Wallace.
    Phil says to Ayn because it was right after her husband died “God, bless you” and asks her if she would object to that, Ayn said no because that is the “highest” thing you can say to someone. She wasn’t the kind of atheists we have around us today, spawned by Madelene Murray O’hare-that fruit cake, her son who was used in the lawsuit to end prayer in school ended up a Christian, paybacks are hell.
    Atheism worked for Ayn-she did not really and truly preach it as a religion like so many of them like to do.
    In one of here books she even breaks down the Serenity Prayer and how much she likes it (except for that pesky word God-but she doesn’t get preachy about it).
    We Christians have an “individual” personal relationship with God-no one can ever die for our sins again-no one can be our savior again-Christianity is a oneness with God-it is an objective belief system-maybe that is why objectivism fits into my Christianity.
    I have never read Atlas-shame on me-I have had the book for 30 years in my library-see the movie The Fountainhead with Gary Cooper-that might help.
    You may be having an issue with what may seem a lack of compassion in objectivism-she explains the differences of compassion and empathy and altruism. Altruism for her is almost like somebody nailing us to a cross for them-and my belief is that there was one who was nailed on the cross and I don’t have to be, I can contribute to charities and do my “good” works (which won’t get me into heaven) but if it makes me good to help someone, I have the choice, there isn’t anyone telling me what to do for the sake of someone else.
    Sorry I went on so long-I love to talk about these things-I love to see people gain and grow in whatever religion they practice and I believe that there is a paradox with Ayn’s athiesm and her objectivism, it almost makes someone a better Christian. Thanks for listening to me. Hope it helps.

  1. There are no trackbacks for this post yet.

Leave a Reply