<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will arguing semantics further the dialogue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewmackay.net/2010/01/27/will-arguing-semantics-further-the-dialogue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewmackay.net/2010/01/27/will-arguing-semantics-further-the-dialogue/</link>
	<description>Home of Andrew Mackay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: andrew mackay</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmackay.net/2010/01/27/will-arguing-semantics-further-the-dialogue/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew mackay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmackay.net/?p=793#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Matt, while I understand your frustration, I guess I just think it shouldn&#039;t be surprising: Paul predicted it in 1 Cor 11:18-19. &quot;For, in the first place, when you come together as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you. And I believe it in part, for there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized.&quot; So, there&#039;s going to be some of that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, while I understand your frustration, I guess I just think it shouldn&#8217;t be surprising: Paul predicted it in 1 Cor 11:18-19. &#8220;For, in the first place, when you come together as a church, I hear that there are divisions among you. And I believe it in part, for there must be factions among you in order that those who are genuine among you may be recognized.&#8221; So, there&#8217;s going to be some of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattymac</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmackay.net/2010/01/27/will-arguing-semantics-further-the-dialogue/comment-page-1/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattymac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmackay.net/?p=793#comment-685</guid>
		<description>Can i add another discussion that would happen, but possibly shouldn&#039;t? Rhetorical, because i&#039;m going to. 

3. Which Christian world view and values will be reflected/supported/advocated/illustrated? 

To be honest, this is one of the things that drives me nuts about Christianity. The fact that something that completely supports one Christian (and by that i mean protestant) worldview, may be contradictory to many other protestant worldviews, based on certain much-argued points of theology, history, attitudes, etc. 

...I&#039;m just saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i add another discussion that would happen, but possibly shouldn&#8217;t? Rhetorical, because i&#8217;m going to. </p>
<p>3. Which Christian world view and values will be reflected/supported/advocated/illustrated? </p>
<p>To be honest, this is one of the things that drives me nuts about Christianity. The fact that something that completely supports one Christian (and by that i mean protestant) worldview, may be contradictory to many other protestant worldviews, based on certain much-argued points of theology, history, attitudes, etc. </p>
<p>&#8230;I&#8217;m just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew mackay</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmackay.net/2010/01/27/will-arguing-semantics-further-the-dialogue/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew mackay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmackay.net/?p=793#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Exactly my point, oh Hermit Editor -- I guess I&#039;m not as clear as I think I am. I&#039;m concerned that there ought to be at least two discussions occurring: 

1. What does a movie that reflects/supports/advocates/illustrates a Christian world view and Christian values look like?

2. What should the quality of a movie that reflects/supports/advocates/illustrates a Christian world view be like?

Because right now, the conversation breaks down at &quot;is it a Christian movie / song / painting&quot; and breaks down into semantics like, &quot;There&#039;s no such thing as a Christian movie.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my point, oh Hermit Editor &#8212; I guess I&#8217;m not as clear as I think I am. I&#8217;m concerned that there ought to be at least two discussions occurring: </p>
<p>1. What does a movie that reflects/supports/advocates/illustrates a Christian world view and Christian values look like?</p>
<p>2. What should the quality of a movie that reflects/supports/advocates/illustrates a Christian world view be like?</p>
<p>Because right now, the conversation breaks down at &#8220;is it a Christian movie / song / painting&#8221; and breaks down into semantics like, &#8220;There&#8217;s no such thing as a Christian movie.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hermit Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmackay.net/2010/01/27/will-arguing-semantics-further-the-dialogue/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hermit Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmackay.net/?p=793#comment-681</guid>
		<description>But...people don&#039;t mean &quot;Is the movie a Christian?&quot;; they mean &quot;Does the movie reflect/support/advocate/illustrate a Christian world view and Christian values?&quot; Indeed, they do mean &quot;Is it a reflection of the redemption we have experienced?&quot; 

Isn&#039;t the quality of it a separate issue (except of course that anything done to reflect our redemption should preferably be of the highest quality)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;people don&#8217;t mean &#8220;Is the movie a Christian?&#8221;; they mean &#8220;Does the movie reflect/support/advocate/illustrate a Christian world view and Christian values?&#8221; Indeed, they do mean &#8220;Is it a reflection of the redemption we have experienced?&#8221; </p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t the quality of it a separate issue (except of course that anything done to reflect our redemption should preferably be of the highest quality)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- www.000webhost.com Analytics Code -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php"></script>
<noscript><a href="http://www.hosting24.com/"><img src="http://analytics.hosting24.com/count.php" alt="web hosting" /></a></noscript>
<!-- End Of Analytics Code -->
